Linux in General > Os Talk
Difference between Redhat and Mandrake Linux
xhunter:
hi everybody this is the first time i write a subject in this forum
for sure i like it cuz i found a lot of things that i don't know 'bout linux
and Thank you! for everyone who write in this forum :D :D :D :D
i want to know the diffrence between RedHat and Mandrik
for me i installed redhat 9 and i like it but i'dont know 'bout the other versions
can u answer me cuz i wanna try the other versions but iwant to know the features
XHunter :wink:
vijeesh_ep:
I think Mandrake is more userfriendly.Newbies can easily start with it.
But for advance users Redhat is the best as there exist large no of
documentation and good technical support specifically for Redhat.
GNUrag:
See, Many people say this is good for newbies because of better graphical interface... that is good for networking... etc etc etc.... But the thing is that.... a good GUI most of the times depends on which version of GNOME / KDE is installed by default.... My overall experience is that... Redhat is not a good distribution for any purposes.... It didn't have support for mp3 (dont know about fedora)... it does not support NTFS partitions natively and you have to recompile kernel for enabling it...
Overall... Mandrake/SuSE are good distros.... Knoppix 3.4 is the best and takes lesser space on harddisk and includes most of the daily used applications on a single CD...
jeeva:
hi,
the answer for your question, depends upon the purpose of your work. i used both redhat and suse, but i felt redhat is handy and quite good one!!
jeeva
neo:
It will also depend upon your level of expertise on Linux... Mandrake is better for new users...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version